• Click here to download a copy of the slides.


  • Click to read PepperDigital's series on the pitfalls and promises of global social media.

Our work

  • peppercom workshops

« Tweet Your Way to Great Coverage | Main | The Military and Social Networking »

November 10, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e5501aaa248834010535e2488f970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Obama’s Community of Millions:

Comments

Dustin Bratcher

Personally, I'm more interested in how Obama uses the internet during his administration than anything else he could do.

At the end of the day, politics are politics, but this is different. This is a wild card because it's never been done. Ultimately, this could bring the public closer to Washington. The citizens could be able to see more of what is going on and voice their opinions easier.

This could be the end of "call your congressman and tell them to vote yes/no" commercials and advertisements. Instead, it will be "log on to the web site and voice your opinions."

Essentially, Obama could implement the internet technology to allow the public to voice their opinions or dissatisfaction with the government or Obama himself. Which, if you think about it, is insane and great all at the same time.

Great because of the obvious reasons, but insane because the government is essentially setting up an easier way for people to complain and "hassle" them in a more concentrated way. I'm more apt to jump on the net than I am to pick up a phone and call my congressman.

It will be interesting to see if this route is taken because this could bring about all of the "change" both parties were talking about through more public opinion. But this could end up being an atomic bomb of change for the old politicians that looks like a stick of dynamite on paper.

Sam Ford

Good point, Dustin, that they are making it easier for us to complain to them. But if the job of the government is to represent the people, then--idealistically--complaining is an important part of the problem. Do we taxpayers want to pay for staff that handles sifting through our thoughts? In this case, actually, probably yes, since it's a much more direct use of money than all the money poured into monitoring our opinion in various ways...

jon

The president needs to put a perminant end to short selling in the market. sooner than later. short selling does nothing but drive down the market and that is not what we need right now.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment