By Carl Foster, PepperDigital
I picked up my first copy of the free London Evening Standard today. As the editorial page proudly declares, it was established in 1827, but, since 11 October 2009, it has dropped its 50 pence cover price and has been handed out for free.
It was a sad turn of events for those associated with the paper, but realistically one of few ways forward. Earlier this year, The Evening Standard was bought for £1 by a Russian billionaire, who also secured all its debts. After a smart advertising campaign, a revamped design and, most interestingly, an apology to its readers for being too right wing, The Standard relaunched. However, it was only when The London Paper, one of the two lightweight evening commuter newspapers, closed its doors in September did The Standard announce it would become a freesheet.
So, The Standard is just going to fill the space left by The London Paper, capture its readers, retain its old readers and pick up some new ones along the way? And this increased circulation means more eyes on newspaper adverts and, bingo, we have a solution to the crisis gripping newspapers everywhere? I don't think so. I think The Standard has dealt itself a fatal blow from which it will be difficult to recover. How many people want to read a full newspaper in the evening? For me, at least, it has taken two weeks to see what the free version looks like.
I think a more long-term solution would have been to leverage the historic brand of The London Evening Standard to create a true website for Londoners. This could be modelled on websites like www.boston.com, which is the homepage of many people I know in Beantown. Meanwhile, the print newspaper could have been turned into a high-end weekly news magazine for London. Unfortunately, with the value of the brand devalued by making The Standard free, this will now be a difficult strategy to follow.
Meanwhile, over at News International, owner (or should that be closer) of The London Paper Rupert Murdoch plans to charge for online access for the content of all its newspapers (The Times, The Sun, etc).
Two very different paths then. Which one will succeed remains to be seen.







